Verdict up front: Forex Signal Daily: FZSIGNAL claims its calls run at “over 85% as shown in the history”. The history it refers to is the one kept inside its own app. It has 50,000+ installs and a 4.8 rating.
Forex Signal Daily: FZSIGNAL
fxsignals · Google Play · Finance
FLAGGED APP
- Package
- com.farshadddz.fxanalysissignals
- Installs
- 50,000+
- Rating
- 4.8 from 2,540 reviews
- In-app purchases
- Yes
- Accuracy claimed
- “Over 85%, as shown in the history”
- Markets
- Currency pairs, gold, stocks, cryptocurrencies
As shown in the history
This is the most important phrase on the listing, and it is doing something specific. It sounds like evidence. It points at a record. But the record is the app’s own history screen, written by the same people who write the signals, with no external party able to see what was published before the outcome was known.
A real track record is timestamped by somebody else. That is the entire point of third-party monitoring services: the calls are locked in before the market moves, and the losers cannot quietly stop being calls.
Eighty-five per cent of what
An accuracy figure means nothing without the size of the wins and losses beside it. A service can be right eighty-five per cent of the time and still lose money, if the fifteen per cent that go wrong are allowed to run. The listing gives the hit rate and omits the risk-reward, which is the half that decides whether a user ends the month up or down.
⚠ Verified evidence
- It claims “over 85%” accuracy, sourced to its own in-app history.
- No third-party monitored account is named or linked.
- It gives a hit rate but no risk-reward ratio and no drawdown.
- Signals are said to come from a “professional forex team” that is never named.
- 50,000+ installs, rated 4.8 from 2,540 reviews, with in-app purchases.
- It covers currency pairs, gold, stocks and cryptocurrencies from one team.
Did FZSIGNAL cost you money or time?
Tell us what happened. One email starts it — no form, no phone call, no fee.
Or write to us directly: support@reclaimdc.com
Include the app name, any amount you paid, and screenshots if you have them. Never send passwords, private keys or seed phrases.
Why in-app histories cannot be trusted
A signal log kept by the seller can be edited, filtered or reset. Nothing on a phone screen shows you the calls that were deleted. This is not an accusation about one app — it is the structural reason regulators require performance claims to be independently verifiable, and the reason a hit rate quoted from a private log carries no weight at all.
How to test an accuracy claim
Ask for a link to a third-party monitored account and open it. Look for the maximum drawdown and the worst month. Ask what the average win is against the average loss. If the only evidence offered is a screen inside the product being sold, treat the number as advertising copy, because that is what it is.
The verdict: a widely installed signals app quoting an 85 per cent hit rate from its own internal log, with no external verification and no risk figures. Do not pay on the strength of that number.
Sources, checked 25 September 2026: Google Play listing for com.farshadddz.fxanalysissignals, read in full on 25 September 2026 — description, accuracy claim, install band, rating, review count, in-app purchase status and category
